繁體
  • 简体中文
  • 繁體中文

熱門資訊> 正文

哪種投資者擁有OUSTER,Inc.(紐約證券交易所代碼:OUST)的大部分股份?

2022-06-25 01:54

A look at the shareholders of Ouster, Inc. (NYSE:OUST) can tell us which group is most powerful. Institutions often own shares in more established companies, while it's not unusual to see insiders own a fair bit of smaller companies. I quite like to see at least a little bit of insider ownership. As Charlie Munger said 'Show me the incentive and I will show you the outcome.

看看OUSTER,Inc.(紐約證券交易所股票代碼:OUST)的股東就能知道哪個集團最有權勢。機構通常持有較成熟公司的股票,而內部人士擁有相當一部分較小公司的情況並不少見。我非常希望看到至少有一點內部人持股。正如查理·芒格所説,給我看激勵措施,我就會告訴你結果。

Ouster is not a large company by global standards. It has a market capitalization of US$347m, which means it wouldn't have the attention of many institutional investors. In the chart below, we can see that institutional investors have bought into the company. Let's delve deeper into each type of owner, to discover more about Ouster.

按照全球標準,OUSTER並不是一家大公司。它的市值為3.47億美元,這意味着它不會受到許多機構投資者的關注。在下面的圖表中,我們可以看到機構投資者買入了該公司的股票。讓我們更深入地研究每種類型的所有者,以發現更多關於驅逐的信息。

See our latest analysis for Ouster

請參閱我們對罷免的最新分析

NYSE:OUST Ownership Breakdown June 24th 2022
紐約證券交易所:2022年6月24日驅逐所有權分解

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Ouster?

關於罷免,機構所有制告訴了我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時,以基準來衡量自己,因此一旦一隻股票被納入主要指數,它們往往會對這隻股票變得更加熱情。我們預計,大多數公司都會有一些機構登記在冊,特別是在它們正在增長的情況下。

We can see that Ouster does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Ouster, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到,ouster確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司很大一部分股票。這可以表明該公司在投資界具有一定的公信力。然而,最好警惕依賴機構投資者帶來的所謂驗證。他們也一樣,有時也會犯錯。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售一隻股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得查看一下罷免的過去收益軌跡(見下圖)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

NYSE:OUST Earnings and Revenue Growth June 24th 2022
紐約證券交易所:取消2022年6月24日的收益和收入增長

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Ouster. Banyan Venture Holdings Llc is currently the company's largest shareholder with 15% of shares outstanding. Cox Investment Holdings, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 7.0% of common stock, and Tao Capital Management LP holds about 6.5% of the company stock. Additionally, the company's CEO Charles Pacala directly holds 2.5% of the total shares outstanding.

我們注意到,對衝基金並沒有對驅逐進行有意義的投資。Banyan Venture Holdings LLC目前是該公司的最大股東,持有15%的流通股。考克斯投資控股公司是第二大股東,持有7.0%的普通股,陶氏資本管理有限公司持有該公司約6.5%的股份。此外,該公司首席執行官查爾斯·帕卡拉直接持有總流通股的2.5%。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 8 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

進一步考察,我們發現,該公司超過一半的股份由前8名股東持有,這表明大股東的利益在一定程度上被小股東平衡了。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

雖然研究一家公司的機構持股可以增加你的研究價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地瞭解一隻股票的預期表現也是一個很好的做法。相當多的分析師追蹤這隻股票,所以你可以很容易地研究預測增長。

Insider Ownership Of Ouster

罷免的內部人所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

不同國家對內部人的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是算數的。管理層最終要向董事會負責。然而,經理人擔任執行董事會成員並不少見,尤其是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官的話。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認為內部人持股是一件好事。然而,在某些情況下,這會讓其他股東更難讓董事會對決策負責。

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Ouster, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$347m, and insiders have US$61m worth of shares in their own names. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的信息表明,內部人士持有OUSTER,Inc.的大量股份。它的市值僅為3.47億美元,內部人士以自己的名義持有價值6100萬美元的股票。我們會説,這表明了與股東的一致,但值得注意的是,該公司仍相當小;一些內部人士可能創建了這家企業。你可以點擊這里,看看這些內部人士是一直在買入還是賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 24% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Ouster. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

擁有24%股權的公眾,主要由個人投資者組成,對罷免有一定程度的影響力。雖然這羣人不一定能發號施令,但它肯定能對公司的運營方式產生真正的影響。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股權所有權

With a stake of 6.1%, private equity firms could influence the Ouster board. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.

私募股權公司持有6.1%的股份,可能會影響罷免董事會。一些人可能會喜歡這樣,因為私人股本有時是讓管理層承擔責任的積極分子。但在其他時候,私募股權公司讓公司上市后,它們的股票都賣光了。

Private Company Ownership

私營公司所有權

We can see that Private Companies own 22%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

我們可以看到,私營公司擁有22%的已發行股份。或許有必要對此進行更深入的研究。如果關聯方,如內部人士,對這些私營公司中的一家有利害關係,則應在年報中披露。私營公司也可能對該公司擁有戰略利益。

Next Steps:

接下來的步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Ouster better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - Ouster has 4 warning signs we think you should be aware of.

擁有一家公司股票的不同集團總是值得考慮的。但爲了更好地理解《罷免》,我們還需要考慮許多其他因素。以風險為例--罷免4個警示標誌我們認為你應該意識到。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終未來是最重要的。您可以訪問此免費分析師對該公司的預測報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數字是使用過去12個月的數據計算的,指的是截至財務報表日期的最后一個月的12個月期間。這可能與全年的年度報告數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有什麼反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎? 保持聯繫直接與我們聯繫。或者,也可以給編輯組發電子郵件,地址是implywallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall St.撰寫,具有概括性。我們僅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並不打算作為財務建議。它不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮你的目標或你的財務狀況。我們的目標是為您帶來由基本面數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會將最新的對價格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考慮在內。Simply Wall St.對上述任何一隻股票都沒有持倉。

風險及免責提示:以上內容僅代表作者的個人立場和觀點,不代表華盛的任何立場,華盛亦無法證實上述內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。投資者在做出任何投資決定前,應結合自身情況,考慮投資產品的風險。必要時,請諮詢專業投資顧問的意見。華盛不提供任何投資建議,對此亦不做任何承諾和保證。