OpenDoor Technologies Inc.(納斯達克代碼:OPEN)的每一位投資者都應該知道最強大的股東羣體。一般來説,隨着公司的成長,機構會增加他們的持股。相反,隨着時間的推移,內部人士往往會減少他們的持股。我通常喜歡看到一定程度的內部人持股,即使只是一小部分。正如納西姆·尼古拉斯·塔勒布所説,不要告訴我你的想法,告訴我你的投資組合中有什麼。
熱門資訊> 正文
2022-06-22 03:43
Every investor in Opendoor Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ:OPEN) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. Generally speaking, as a company grows, institutions will increase their ownership. Conversely, insiders often decrease their ownership over time. I generally like to see some degree of insider ownership, even if only a little. As Nassim Nicholas Taleb said, 'Don't tell me what you think, tell me what you have in your portfolio.
OpenDoor Technologies Inc.(納斯達克代碼:OPEN)的每一位投資者都應該知道最強大的股東羣體。一般來説,隨着公司的成長,機構會增加他們的持股。相反,隨着時間的推移,內部人士往往會減少他們的持股。我通常喜歡看到一定程度的內部人持股,即使只是一小部分。正如納西姆·尼古拉斯·塔勒布所説,不要告訴我你的想法,告訴我你的投資組合中有什麼。
Opendoor Technologies has a market capitalization of US$3.0b, so it's too big to fly under the radar. We'd expect to see both institutions and retail investors owning a portion of the company. Our analysis of the ownership of the company, below, shows that institutional investors have bought into the company. We can zoom in on the different ownership groups, to learn more about Opendoor Technologies.
OpenDoor Technologies的市值為30億美元,因此它太大了,不能在雷達下飛行。我們預計,機構投資者和散户投資者都將擁有該公司的部分股權。我們對該公司所有權的分析顯示,機構投資者買入了該公司的股票。我們可以放大不同的所有權組,以瞭解有關OpenDoor Technologies的更多信息。
View our latest analysis for Opendoor Technologies
查看我們對OpenDoor Technologies的最新分析
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與經常跟蹤的指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常確實會考慮收購被納入相關基準指數的較大公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Opendoor Technologies. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Opendoor Technologies' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
正如你所看到的,機構投資者在OpenDoor Technologies擁有相當多的股份。這可以表明該公司在投資界具有一定的公信力。然而,最好警惕依賴機構投資者帶來的所謂驗證。他們也一樣,有時也會犯錯。當多家機構持有一隻股票時,它們總是面臨「擁擠交易」的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速拋售股票。在一家沒有增長曆史的公司,這一風險更高。你可以在下面看到OpenDoor Technologies的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事中總是有更多的東西。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Opendoor Technologies. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. with 7.2% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 7.0% and 6.6%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Furthermore, CEO Eric Chung Wu is the owner of 5.7% of the company's shares.
由於機構投資者擁有一半以上的已發行股票,董事會可能不得不關注他們的偏好。對衝基金在OpenDoor Technologies的股份並不多。查看我們的數據,我們可以看到,最大的股東是T.Rowe Price Group,Inc.,持有7.2%的流通股。與此同時,第二大和第三大股東分別持有7.0%和6.6%的流通股。此外,首席執行官胡持有該公司5.7%的股份。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 12 have the combined ownership of 51% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.
在進一步挖掘后,我們發現前12名股東合計持有公司51%的股份,這表明沒有單一股東對公司擁有重大控制權。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
雖然研究一家公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以瞭解風向也是有意義的。有很多分析師在追蹤這隻股票,所以他們的預測可能也是值得的。
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
儘管對內部人的準確定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認為董事會成員是內部人。公司管理層對董事會負責,董事會應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時最高層管理人員本身也是董事會成員。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認為內部人持股是積極的,因為它可以表明董事會與其他股東很好地結盟。然而,在某些情況下,太多的權力集中在這個羣體中。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Opendoor Technologies Inc.. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$275m worth of shares (at current prices). If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
我們最新的數據顯示,內部人士持有OpenDoor Technologies Inc.的一些股份。這是一家相當大的公司,因此看到一些潛在的有意義的結盟通常是積極的。在這種情況下,他們擁有價值約2.75億美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。如果你想探討內部人結盟的問題,你可以點擊這里,看看內部人是一直在買入還是賣出。
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 15% stake in Opendoor Technologies. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
公眾通常是個人投資者,他們持有OpenDoor Technologies 15%的股份。雖然這羣人不一定能發號施令,但它肯定能對公司的運營方式產生真正的影響。
Private equity firms hold a 6.6% stake in Opendoor Technologies. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.
私募股權公司持有OpenDoor Technologies 6.6%的股份。這表明,他們可以在關鍵的政策決策中發揮影響力。有時我們會看到私募股權投資長期存在,但總的來説,它們的投資期限較短,而且--顧名思義--不會對上市公司進行太多投資。一段時間后,他們可能會考慮出售並將資本重新配置到其他地方。
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 6.3%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.
我們的數據顯示,私營公司持有該公司6.3%的股份。或許有必要對此進行更深入的研究。如果關聯方,如內部人士,對這些私營公司中的一家有利害關係,則應在年報中披露。私營公司也可能對該公司擁有戰略利益。
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 3 warning signs for Opendoor Technologies you should know about.
我發現看看到底是誰擁有一家公司是非常有趣的。但爲了真正獲得洞察力,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,考慮一下風險。每家公司都有它們,我們已經發現OpenDoor Technologies的3個警告信號你應該知道。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果你更願意瞭解分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這一預期免費關於分析師預測的報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數字是使用過去12個月的數據計算的,指的是截至財務報表日期的最后一個月的12個月期間。這可能與全年的年度報告數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有什麼反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎? 保持聯繫直接與我們聯繫。或者,也可以給編輯組發電子郵件,地址是implywallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall St.撰寫,具有概括性。我們僅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並不打算作為財務建議。它不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮你的目標或你的財務狀況。我們的目標是為您帶來由基本面數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會將最新的對價格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考慮在內。Simply Wall St.對上述任何一隻股票都沒有持倉。