如果你想知道誰真正控制了Genius Sports Limited(紐約證券交易所代碼:GENI),那麼你就得看看它的股票登記簿的構成。內部人士通常持有大量較年輕、規模較小的公司,而大公司往往有機構作為股東。我非常希望看到至少有一點內部人持股。正如查理·芒格所説,給我看激勵措施,我就會告訴你結果。
熱門資訊> 正文
2022-06-20 18:32
If you want to know who really controls Genius Sports Limited (NYSE:GENI), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. Insiders often own a large chunk of younger, smaller, companies while huge companies tend to have institutions as shareholders. I quite like to see at least a little bit of insider ownership. As Charlie Munger said 'Show me the incentive and I will show you the outcome.
如果你想知道誰真正控制了Genius Sports Limited(紐約證券交易所代碼:GENI),那麼你就得看看它的股票登記簿的構成。內部人士通常持有大量較年輕、規模較小的公司,而大公司往往有機構作為股東。我非常希望看到至少有一點內部人持股。正如查理·芒格所説,給我看激勵措施,我就會告訴你結果。
Genius Sports is a smaller company with a market capitalization of US$505m, so it may still be flying under the radar of many institutional investors. Our analysis of the ownership of the company, below, shows that institutions are noticeable on the share registry. Let's delve deeper into each type of owner, to discover more about Genius Sports.
Genius Sports是一家規模較小的公司,市值為5.05億美元,因此它可能仍在許多機構投資者的雷達下飛行。我們對公司所有權的分析如下所示,機構在股票登記處是顯而易見的。讓我們更深入地研究每一種類型的所有者,以發現更多關於天才體育的信息。
View our latest analysis for Genius Sports
查看我們對天才體育的最新分析
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構以一個接近當地市場的指數來衡量它們的表現。因此,他們通常更關注那些被納入主要指數的公司。
Genius Sports already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Genius Sports' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
Genius Sports已經在股票登記處登記了機構。事實上,他們在該公司擁有可觀的股份。這意味着為這些機構工作的分析師已經看過了這隻股票,他們喜歡它。但就像其他人一樣,他們也可能錯了。如果多家機構同時改變對一隻股票的看法,你可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,下面是Genius Sports的盈利歷史,值得一看。當然,未來纔是真正重要的。
It looks like hedge funds own 6.3% of Genius Sports shares. That's interesting, because hedge funds can be quite active and activist. Many look for medium term catalysts that will drive the share price higher. The company's largest shareholder is Apax Partners LLP, with ownership of 34%. With 6.3% and 3.5% of the shares outstanding respectively, Caledonia (Private) Investments Pty Limited and Harry You are the second and third largest shareholders. Harry You, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Member of the Board of Directors. Additionally, the company's CEO Mark Locke directly holds 3.2% of the total shares outstanding.
看起來對衝基金持有Genius Sports 6.3%的股份。這很有趣,因為對衝基金可以相當活躍和積極。許多人在尋找將推動股價走高的中期催化劑。該公司的最大股東是Apax Partners LLP,持有34%的股份。喀里多尼亞(私人)投資有限公司和Harry You分別持有6.3%和3.5%的流通股,是第二大和第三大股東。作為第三大股東的哈里·尤也恰好擁有董事會成員的頭銜。此外,該公司首席執行官駱家輝直接持有總流通股的3.2%。
On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 6 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.
進一步考察,我們發現該公司超過一半的股份由前六大股東持有,這表明大股東的利益在一定程度上被小股東平衡了。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
雖然研究一家公司的機構持股可以增加你的研究價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地瞭解一隻股票的預期表現也是一個很好的做法。有很多分析師在追蹤這隻股票,所以他們的預測可能也是值得的。
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
公司內部人的定義可能是主觀的,而且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個別內部人士,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理層管理企業,但首席執行官將向董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認為內部人持股是一件好事。然而,在某些情況下,這會讓其他股東更難讓董事會對決策負責。
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Genius Sports Limited. Insiders have a US$54m stake in this US$505m business. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
內部人士似乎擁有Genius Sports Limited相當大的比例。在這項價值5.05億美元的業務中,內部人士持有5400萬美元的股份。我們會説,這表明了與股東的一致,但值得注意的是,該公司仍相當小;一些內部人士可能創建了這家企業。你可以點擊這里,看看這些內部人士是一直在買入還是賣出。
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 19% stake in Genius Sports. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
公眾通常是個人投資者,他們持有Genius Sports 19%的股份。儘管這種規模的所有權可能不足以影響有利於他們的政策決定,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Private equity firms hold a 34% stake in Genius Sports. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.
私募股權公司持有Genius Sports 34%的股份。這表明,他們可以在關鍵的政策決策中發揮影響力。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因為私人股本有時能夠鼓勵有助於市場看到公司價值的策略。或者,這些持有者可能會在投資上市后退出。
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Genius Sports better, we need to consider many other factors. For instance, we've identified 3 warning signs for Genius Sports that you should be aware of.
擁有一家公司股票的不同集團總是值得考慮的。但要更好地理解天才體育,我們還需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,我們已經確定天才體育的3個警示信號這一點你應該知道。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最終未來是最重要的。您可以訪問此免費分析師對該公司的預測報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數字是使用過去12個月的數據計算的,指的是截至財務報表日期的最后一個月的12個月期間。這可能與全年的年度報告數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有什麼反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎? 保持聯繫直接與我們聯繫。或者,也可以給編輯組發電子郵件,地址是implywallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall St.撰寫,具有概括性。我們僅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並不打算作為財務建議。它不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮你的目標或你的財務狀況。我們的目標是為您帶來由基本面數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會將最新的對價格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考慮在內。Simply Wall St.對上述任何一隻股票都沒有持倉。