在本文中,我們將通過將預測的公司未來現金流折現為今天的價值來估計Ansys公司(納斯達克:ANSS)的內在價值。貼現現金流(DCF)模型是我們將應用的工具。在你認為你將無法理解它之前,只需繼續閲讀!它實際上比你想象的要簡單得多。
熱門資訊> 正文
2022-06-20 20:22
In this article we are going to estimate the intrinsic value of ANSYS, Inc. (NASDAQ:ANSS) by taking the forecast future cash flows of the company and discounting them back to today's value. The Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) model is the tool we will apply to do this. Before you think you won't be able to understand it, just read on! It's actually much less complex than you'd imagine.
在本文中,我們將通過將預測的公司未來現金流折現為今天的價值來估計Ansys公司(納斯達克:ANSS)的內在價值。貼現現金流(DCF)模型是我們將應用的工具。在你認為你將無法理解它之前,只需繼續閲讀!它實際上比你想象的要簡單得多。
Companies can be valued in a lot of ways, so we would point out that a DCF is not perfect for every situation. If you still have some burning questions about this type of valuation, take a look at the Simply Wall St analysis model.
對公司的估值可以有很多種方式,因此我們要指出,貼現現金流並不適用於每一種情況。如果你對這類估值還有一些亟待解決的問題,不妨看看Simply Wall St.的分析模型。
See our latest analysis for ANSYS
請參閱我們對Ansys的最新分析
We use what is known as a 2-stage model, which simply means we have two different periods of growth rates for the company's cash flows. Generally the first stage is higher growth, and the second stage is a lower growth phase. To start off with, we need to estimate the next ten years of cash flows. Where possible we use analyst estimates, but when these aren't available we extrapolate the previous free cash flow (FCF) from the last estimate or reported value. We assume companies with shrinking free cash flow will slow their rate of shrinkage, and that companies with growing free cash flow will see their growth rate slow, over this period. We do this to reflect that growth tends to slow more in the early years than it does in later years.
我們使用所謂的兩階段模型,也就是説,公司的現金流有兩個不同的增長率。一般來説,第一階段是較高增長階段,第二階段是較低增長階段。首先,我們需要估計未來十年的現金流。在可能的情況下,我們使用分析師的估計,但當這些估計不可用時,我們會根據上次估計或報告的價值推斷先前的自由現金流(FCF)。我們假設,自由現金流萎縮的公司將減緩收縮速度,而自由現金流增長的公司在這段時間內的增長速度將放緩。我們這樣做是爲了反映出,增長在最初幾年往往比后來幾年放緩得更多。
Generally we assume that a dollar today is more valuable than a dollar in the future, and so the sum of these future cash flows is then discounted to today's value:
一般來説,我們假設今天的一美元比未來的一美元更有價值,所以這些未來現金流的總和就會貼現到今天的價值:
2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | 2027 | 2028 | 2029 | 2030 | 2031 | |
Levered FCF ($, Millions) | US$587.7m | US$666.7m | US$823.0m | US$982.0m | US$1.08b | US$1.15b | US$1.21b | US$1.26b | US$1.31b | US$1.35b |
Growth Rate Estimate Source | Analyst x8 | Analyst x8 | Analyst x3 | Analyst x1 | Analyst x1 | Est @ 6.7% | Est @ 5.26% | Est @ 4.26% | Est @ 3.56% | Est @ 3.07% |
Present Value ($, Millions) Discounted @ 6.3% | US$553 | US$590 | US$686 | US$770 | US$797 | US$800 | US$792 | US$777 | US$758 | US$735 |
2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | 2027 | 2028 | 2029 | 2030 | 2031 | |
槓桿式FCF(百萬美元) | 5.877億美元 | 6.667億美元 | 8.23億美元 | 9.82億美元 | 10.8億美元 | 11.5億美元 | 12.1億美元 | 12.6億美元 | 13.1億美元 | 13.5億美元 |
增長率預估來源 | 分析師x8 | 分析師x8 | 分析師x3 | 分析師x1 | 分析師x1 | EST@6.7% | Est@5.26% | Est@4.26% | Est@3.56% | Est@3.07% |
現值(美元,百萬)貼現@6.3% | 553美元 | 590美元 | 686美元 | 770美元 | 797美元 | 800美元 | 792美元 | 777美元 | 758美元 | 735美元 |
("Est" = FCF growth rate estimated by Simply Wall St)
Present Value of 10-year Cash Flow (PVCF) = US$7.3b
(「EST」=Simply Wall St.預估的FCF成長率)
10年期現金流現值(PVCF)=73億美元
The second stage is also known as Terminal Value, this is the business's cash flow after the first stage. For a number of reasons a very conservative growth rate is used that cannot exceed that of a country's GDP growth. In this case we have used the 5-year average of the 10-year government bond yield (1.9%) to estimate future growth. In the same way as with the 10-year 'growth' period, we discount future cash flows to today's value, using a cost of equity of 6.3%.
第二階段也被稱為終端價值,這是企業在第一階段之后的現金流。出於一些原因,使用了一個非常保守的增長率,不能超過一個國家的國內生產總值增長率。在這種情況下,我們使用了10年期政府債券收益率的5年平均值(1.9%)來估計未來的增長。與10年「增長」期一樣,我們使用6.3%的權益成本將未來現金流貼現至當前價值。
Terminal Value (TV)= FCF2031 × (1 + g) ÷ (r – g) = US$1.3b× (1 + 1.9%) ÷ (6.3%– 1.9%) = US$32b
終端值(TV)=FCF2031×(1+g)?(r-g)=13億美元×(1+1.9%)?(6.3%-1.9%)=320億美元
Present Value of Terminal Value (PVTV)= TV / (1 + r)10= US$32b÷ ( 1 + 6.3%)10= US$17b
終值現值(PVTV)=TV/(1+r)10=320億美元?(1+6.3%)10=170億美元
The total value is the sum of cash flows for the next ten years plus the discounted terminal value, which results in the Total Equity Value, which in this case is US$24b. The last step is to then divide the equity value by the number of shares outstanding. Relative to the current share price of US$233, the company appears about fair value at a 17% discount to where the stock price trades currently. Remember though, that this is just an approximate valuation, and like any complex formula - garbage in, garbage out.
總價值是未來十年的現金流之和加上貼現的終端價值,這導致總股權價值,在這種情況下是240億美元。最后一步是將股權價值除以流通股數量。相對於目前233美元的股價,該公司的公允價值似乎比目前的股價有17%的折讓。不過,請記住,這只是一個大致的估值,就像任何複雜的公式一樣--垃圾輸入,垃圾輸出。
We would point out that the most important inputs to a discounted cash flow are the discount rate and of course the actual cash flows. If you don't agree with these result, have a go at the calculation yourself and play with the assumptions. The DCF also does not consider the possible cyclicality of an industry, or a company's future capital requirements, so it does not give a full picture of a company's potential performance. Given that we are looking at ANSYS as potential shareholders, the cost of equity is used as the discount rate, rather than the cost of capital (or weighted average cost of capital, WACC) which accounts for debt. In this calculation we've used 6.3%, which is based on a levered beta of 1.026. Beta is a measure of a stock's volatility, compared to the market as a whole. We get our beta from the industry average beta of globally comparable companies, with an imposed limit between 0.8 and 2.0, which is a reasonable range for a stable business.
我們要指出,貼現現金流最重要的投入是貼現率,當然還有實際現金流。如果你不同意這些結果,你可以自己試一試計算,並玩弄一下假設。DCF也沒有考慮一個行業可能的周期性,也沒有考慮一家公司未來的資本要求,因此它沒有給出一家公司潛在業績的全貌。鑑於我們將ansys視為潛在股東,股權成本被用作貼現率,而不是佔債務的資本成本(或加權平均資本成本,WACC)。在這個計算中,我們使用了6.3%,這是基於槓桿率為1.026的測試版。貝塔係數是衡量一隻股票相對於整個市場的波動性的指標。我們的貝塔係數來自全球可比公司的行業平均貝塔係數,強制限制在0.8到2.0之間,這是一個穩定業務的合理範圍。
Valuation is only one side of the coin in terms of building your investment thesis, and it shouldn't be the only metric you look at when researching a company. DCF models are not the be-all and end-all of investment valuation. Instead the best use for a DCF model is to test certain assumptions and theories to see if they would lead to the company being undervalued or overvalued. For example, changes in the company's cost of equity or the risk free rate can significantly impact the valuation. For ANSYS, we've compiled three further elements you should further examine:
就構建你的投資論文而言,估值只是硬幣的一面,它不應該是你在研究一家公司時唯一考慮的指標。貼現現金流模型並不是投資估值的全部。相反,貼現現金流模型的最佳用途是測試某些假設和理論,看看它們是否會導致公司被低估或高估。例如,公司權益成本或無風險利率的變化可能會對估值產生重大影響。對於Ansys,我們已經編制了另外三個元素,您應該進一步研究:
PS. Simply Wall St updates its DCF calculation for every American stock every day, so if you want to find the intrinsic value of any other stock just search here.
PS.Simply Wall St.每天更新每隻美國股票的貼現現金流計算,所以如果你想找出任何其他股票的內在價值,只需搜索此處。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有什麼反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎? 保持聯繫直接與我們聯繫。或者,也可以給編輯組發電子郵件,地址是implywallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall St.撰寫,具有概括性。我們僅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並不打算作為財務建議。它不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮你的目標或你的財務狀況。我們的目標是為您帶來由基本面數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會將最新的對價格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考慮在內。Simply Wall St.對上述任何一隻股票都沒有持倉。