看看美光科技公司(納斯達克:MU)的股東就能知道哪個集團最有權勢。一般來説,隨着公司的成長,機構會增加他們的持股。相反,隨着時間的推移,內部人士往往會減少他們的持股。過去屬於公眾所有的公司往往擁有較低的內部人持股比例。
熱門資訊> 正文
2022-06-17 23:32
A look at the shareholders of Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ:MU) can tell us which group is most powerful. Generally speaking, as a company grows, institutions will increase their ownership. Conversely, insiders often decrease their ownership over time. Companies that used to be publicly owned tend to have lower insider ownership.
看看美光科技公司(納斯達克:MU)的股東就能知道哪個集團最有權勢。一般來説,隨着公司的成長,機構會增加他們的持股。相反,隨着時間的推移,內部人士往往會減少他們的持股。過去屬於公眾所有的公司往往擁有較低的內部人持股比例。
Micron Technology has a market capitalization of US$61b, so it's too big to fly under the radar. We'd expect to see both institutions and retail investors owning a portion of the company. Taking a look at our data on the ownership groups (below), it seems that institutional investors have bought into the company. We can zoom in on the different ownership groups, to learn more about Micron Technology.
美光科技的市值為610億美元,所以它太大了,不能在雷達下飛行。我們預計,機構投資者和散户投資者都將擁有該公司的部分股權。看看我們關於所有權集團的數據(如下所示),似乎是機構投資者買入了該公司的股票。我們可以放大不同的所有權組,瞭解更多關於美光科技的信息。
See our latest analysis for Micron Technology
查看我們對美光科技的最新分析
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時,以基準來衡量自己,因此一旦一隻股票被納入主要指數,它們往往會對這隻股票變得更加熱情。我們預計,大多數公司都會有一些機構登記在冊,特別是在它們正在增長的情況下。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Micron Technology. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Micron Technology, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
如你所見,機構投資者在美光科技擁有相當多的股份。這表明在專業投資者中有一定的可信度。但我們不能僅僅依靠這一事實,因為機構有時會做出糟糕的投資,就像每個人一樣。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售一隻股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,查看美光科技過去的盈利軌跡是值得的(見下圖)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Micron Technology is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that Capital Research and Management Company is the largest shareholder with 8.4% of shares outstanding. With 8.1% and 7.8% of the shares outstanding respectively, The Vanguard Group, Inc. and BlackRock, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders.
機構投資者擁有公司50%以上的股份,因此加在一起可能會強烈影響董事會的決定。美光科技並不為對衝基金所有。我們的數據顯示,Capital Research and Management Company是第一大股東,持有8.4%的流通股。先鋒集團股份有限公司和貝萊德股份有限公司分別佔流通股的8.1%和7.8%,是第二大和第三大股東。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 21 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
仔細觀察我們的持股數據就會發現,前21名股東總共擁有50%的股份,這意味着沒有單一股東擁有多數股權。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
雖然研究一家公司的機構持股可以增加你的研究價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地瞭解一隻股票的預期表現也是一個很好的做法。有相當數量的分析師追蹤該股,因此瞭解他們對未來的總體看法可能是有用的。
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
不同國家對內部人的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是算數的。公司管理層對董事會負責,董事會應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時最高層管理人員本身也是董事會成員。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
內部人持股是積極的,當它標誌着領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時。然而,高內部人持股也可以給公司內部的一個小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Micron Technology, Inc. in their own names. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$148m worth of shares. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.
我們的數據顯示,內部人士以自己的名義持有美光科技公司不到1%的股份。由於它是一家大公司,我們預計內部人士只會持有它一小部分股份。但值得注意的是,他們擁有價值1.48億美元的股票。看到董事會成員持有股票是件好事,但可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否一直在買入。
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 18% stake in Micron Technology. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
公眾通常是個人投資者,他們持有美光科技18%的股份。儘管這種規模的所有權可能不足以影響有利於他們的政策決定,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with Micron Technology .
我發現看看到底是誰擁有一家公司是非常有趣的。但爲了真正獲得洞察力,我們還需要考慮其他信息。為此,您應該意識到1個警告標誌我們發現了美光科技。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果你更願意瞭解分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這一預期免費關於分析師預測的報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數字是使用過去12個月的數據計算的,指的是截至財務報表日期的最后一個月的12個月期間。這可能與全年的年度報告數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有什麼反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎? 保持聯繫直接與我們聯繫。或者,也可以給編輯組發電子郵件,地址是implywallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall St.撰寫,具有概括性。我們僅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並不打算作為財務建議。它不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮你的目標或你的財務狀況。我們的目標是為您帶來由基本面數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會將最新的對價格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考慮在內。Simply Wall St.對上述任何一隻股票都沒有持倉。