紐蒙特公司(紐約證券交易所市場代碼:NEM)的每一位投資者都應該知道最強大的股東羣體。一般來説,隨着公司的成長,機構會增加他們的持股。相反,隨着時間的推移,內部人士往往會減少他們的持股。已經私有化的公司往往擁有較低的內部人持股。
熱門資訊> 正文
2022-06-16 03:06
Every investor in Newmont Corporation (NYSE:NEM) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. Generally speaking, as a company grows, institutions will increase their ownership. Conversely, insiders often decrease their ownership over time. Companies that have been privatized tend to have low insider ownership.
紐蒙特公司(紐約證券交易所市場代碼:NEM)的每一位投資者都應該知道最強大的股東羣體。一般來説,隨着公司的成長,機構會增加他們的持股。相反,隨着時間的推移,內部人士往往會減少他們的持股。已經私有化的公司往往擁有較低的內部人持股。
With a market capitalization of US$50b, Newmont is rather large. We'd expect to see institutional investors on the register. Companies of this size are usually well known to retail investors, too. Taking a look at our data on the ownership groups (below), it seems that institutional investors have bought into the company. We can zoom in on the different ownership groups, to learn more about Newmont.
紐蒙特的市值為500億美元,規模相當大。我們預計會在登記簿上看到機構投資者。這種規模的公司通常也為散户投資者所熟知。看看我們關於所有權集團的數據(如下所示),似乎是機構投資者買入了該公司的股票。我們可以放大不同的所有權集團,瞭解更多關於紐蒙特公司的信息。
See our latest analysis for Newmont
查看我們對紐蒙特公司的最新分析
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時,以基準來衡量自己,因此一旦一隻股票被納入主要指數,它們往往會對這隻股票變得更加熱情。我們預計,大多數公司都會有一些機構登記在冊,特別是在它們正在增長的情況下。
We can see that Newmont does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Newmont's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
我們可以看到,紐蒙特公司確實有機構投資者;他們持有該公司很大一部分股票。這意味着為這些機構工作的分析師已經看過了這隻股票,他們喜歡它。但就像其他人一樣,他們也可能錯了。如果多家機構同時改變對一隻股票的看法,你可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,下面是紐蒙特公司的盈利歷史,值得一看。當然,未來纔是真正重要的。
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Newmont. Our data shows that BlackRock, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 12% of shares outstanding. With 8.4% and 5.1% of the shares outstanding respectively, The Vanguard Group, Inc. and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders.
機構投資者擁有公司50%以上的股份,因此加在一起可能會強烈影響董事會的決定。對衝基金在紐蒙特的股票並不多。我們的數據顯示,貝萊德股份有限公司是第一大股東,持有12%的流通股。先鋒集團和道富環球顧問公司分別持有8.4%和5.1%的流通股,是第二大和第三大股東。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 15 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.
在進一步挖掘后,我們發現前15名股東合計持有公司50%的股份,這表明沒有單一股東對公司擁有重大控制權。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
研究機構持股是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以達到同樣的效果。有相當數量的分析師追蹤該股,因此瞭解他們對未來的總體看法可能是有用的。
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
儘管對內部人的準確定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認為董事會成員是內部人。管理層最終要向董事會負責。然而,經理人擔任執行董事會成員並不少見,尤其是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官的話。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認為內部人持股是一件好事。然而,在某些情況下,這會讓其他股東更難讓董事會對決策負責。
Our information suggests that Newmont Corporation insiders own under 1% of the company. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$64m worth of shares. In this sort of situation, it can be more interesting to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我們的信息顯示,紐蒙特公司內部人士持有該公司不到1%的股份。由於它是一家大公司,我們預計內部人士只會持有它一小部分股份。但值得注意的是,他們持有價值6400萬美元的股票。在這種情況下,看看這些內部人士一直在買入還是賣出,可能會更有趣。
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 17% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
包括散户投資者在內的普通公眾持有該公司17%的股份,因此不能輕易忽視。這種規模的所有權雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Newmont better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should be aware of the 5 warning signs we've spotted with Newmont .
擁有一家公司股票的不同集團總是值得考慮的。但爲了更好地瞭解紐蒙特,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。為此,您應該意識到5個警告標誌我們發現了紐蒙特。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果你更願意瞭解分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這一預期免費關於分析師預測的報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數字是使用過去12個月的數據計算的,指的是截至財務報表日期的最后一個月的12個月期間。這可能與全年的年度報告數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有什麼反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎? 保持聯繫直接與我們聯繫。或者,也可以給編輯組發電子郵件,地址是implywallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall St.撰寫,具有概括性。我們僅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並不打算作為財務建議。它不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮你的目標或你的財務狀況。我們的目標是為您帶來由基本面數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會將最新的對價格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考慮在內。Simply Wall St.對上述任何一隻股票都沒有持倉。