如果你想知道谁真正控制了ServiceNow,Inc.(纽约证券交易所代码:NOW),那么你就得看看它的股票注册表的构成。大公司通常有机构作为股东,我们通常会看到内部人士持有小公司的股份。已经私有化的公司往往拥有较低的内部人持股。
热门资讯> 正文
2022-07-03 20:30
If you want to know who really controls ServiceNow, Inc. (NYSE:NOW), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. Large companies usually have institutions as shareholders, and we usually see insiders owning shares in smaller companies. Companies that have been privatized tend to have low insider ownership.
如果你想知道谁真正控制了ServiceNow,Inc.(纽约证券交易所代码:NOW),那么你就得看看它的股票注册表的构成。大公司通常有机构作为股东,我们通常会看到内部人士持有小公司的股份。已经私有化的公司往往拥有较低的内部人持股。
ServiceNow is a pretty big company. It has a market capitalization of US$97b. Normally institutions would own a significant portion of a company this size. In the chart below, we can see that institutional investors have bought into the company. We can zoom in on the different ownership groups, to learn more about ServiceNow.
ServiceNow是一家相当大的公司。它的市值为970亿美元。通常情况下,机构会持有如此规模的公司的很大一部分股份。在下面的图表中,我们可以看到机构投资者买入了该公司的股票。我们可以放大不同的所有权组,以了解有关ServiceNow的更多信息。
See our latest analysis for ServiceNow
查看我们对ServiceNow的最新分析
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与经常跟踪的指数的回报进行比较。因此,他们通常确实会考虑收购被纳入相关基准指数的较大公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in ServiceNow. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at ServiceNow's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
正如你所看到的,机构投资者在ServiceNow拥有相当多的股份。这可以表明该公司在投资界具有一定的公信力。然而,最好警惕依赖机构投资者带来的所谓验证。他们也一样,有时也会犯错。如果多家机构同时改变对一只股票的看法,你可能会看到股价迅速下跌。因此,值得看看下面ServiceNow的盈利历史。当然,未来才是真正重要的。
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. ServiceNow is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 8.1% of shares outstanding. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 8.0% of common stock, and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. holds about 7.1% of the company stock.
机构投资者拥有公司50%以上的股份,因此加在一起可能会强烈影响董事会的决定。ServiceNow不为对冲基金所有。我们的数据显示,先锋集团是最大的股东,持有8.1%的流通股。贝莱德是第二大股东,持有8.0%的普通股,T.Rowe Price Group,Inc.持有约7.1%的公司股份。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 19 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
仔细观察我们的持股数据就会发现,前19名股东总共拥有50%的股份,这意味着没有单一股东拥有多数股权。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究机构持股是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪,也可以达到同样的效果。有很多分析师在追踪这只股票,所以他们的预测可能也是值得的。
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
不同国家对内部人的定义可能略有不同,但董事会成员总是算数的。公司管理层对董事会负责,董事会应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时最高层管理人员本身也是董事会成员。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部人持股是积极的,因为它可以表明董事会与其他股东很好地结盟。然而,在某些情况下,太多的权力集中在这个群体中。
Our information suggests that ServiceNow, Inc. insiders own under 1% of the company. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$243m of stock. Arguably recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
我们的信息显示,ServiceNow,Inc.的内部人士持有该公司不到1%的股份。由于规模如此之大,我们不会指望内部人士会持有很大比例的股票。他们总共拥有2.43亿美元的股票。可以说,最近的买入和卖出也同样重要。你可以点击这里,看看内部人士是在买入还是卖出。
With a 10% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over ServiceNow. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
拥有10%的股份,普通公众,主要由个人投资者组成,对ServiceNow有一定程度的影响力。尽管这种规模的所有权可能不足以影响有利于他们的政策决定,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand ServiceNow better, we need to consider many other factors. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for ServiceNow you should be aware of.
拥有一家公司股票的不同集团总是值得考虑的。但为了更好地理解ServiceNow,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。一个恰当的例子:我们发现了1个ServiceNow警告标志你应该意识到。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果你像我一样,你可能会想一想这家公司是会增长还是会萎缩。幸运的是,您可以查看这份显示分析师对其未来预测的免费报告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数字是使用过去12个月的数据计算的,指的是截至财务报表日期的最后一个月的12个月期间。这可能与全年的年度报告数字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有什么反馈吗?担心内容吗? 保持联系直接与我们联系。或者,也可以给编辑组发电子邮件,地址是implywallst.com。
本文由Simply Wall St.撰写,具有概括性。我们仅使用不偏不倚的方法提供基于历史数据和分析师预测的评论,我们的文章并不打算作为财务建议。它不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也没有考虑你的目标或你的财务状况。我们的目标是为您带来由基本面数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不会将最新的对价格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考虑在内。Simply Wall St.对上述任何一只股票都没有持仓。